Lets talk about artist selling off these. All they are, are the same character simply colored over or maybe have an extra horn or two. They sell them at silly prices like 20 or more dollars. I personally don't see why people buy them. Sure it puts some extra money in there pockets but it seems to be ripping off the buyer in some way. There is also another thing that irks me about adoptables. Artists make rules for them like not being drawn a certain way or by who. I don't get it. If someone bought one from you why do you think you still have say in what he/she does with it?
karlu20
>an extra horn or too
>too
*two
>They sale them
>sale
*sell
>at silly like 20 or more dollars.
>silly like
Add a word, eg. 'silly prices like'.
>in there pockets
>there
*their
>seems to ripping off the buyer
>to ripping
Add a word, eg. 'to be ripping'
To actually reply to what you said though, it's something the artist enjoys making. And if they're good enough at making it (or marketing it) to supplement their income from a hobby, why wouldn't they? People that have disposable income buy certain things based on their preferences. If you don't share their preferences, you won't see the appeal in luxury items they buy.
And if I create something (eg. a famous movie) and you buy a copy on DVD/ Bluray you do not have the rights to my movie. You can parody it freely, to be sure, but buying it doesn't give you certain rights. This extends to pretty much everything that can be copyrighted. Though to be fair your examples aren't copyright violation if they go no farther.
FurryFox
CHANGED EVERYTHING BEFORE YOU EVEN POSTED HURRR!!!
Anyhow I see where you're coming from BUT recoloring something you made and reselling it seems like a low way to make money. Luxury or not.
Ah but that's the thing with adoptables. You actually purchase those rights to them when you buy them, hence why they're called adoptables in the first place.